You are currently browsing the Web 2.0 information blog weblog archives for April, 2007.

Categories

Archive for April, 2007

The Long Tail: A Motive Force for Web 2.0, Makes Its Official Debut

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

Chris Anderson, Editor-in-Chief of Wired Magazine, has been discussing a concept he calls The Long Tail for quite some time now.  Many of you have no doubt been reading his excellent blog on the subject, and now finally his long-awaited book about this key Web 2.0 business model has been published.  The actual launch day was just over a week ago (some great coverage of this by Chris), yet The Long Tail has long since emerged into the collective consciousness of business and technology thought leaders everywhere.  It was even prominently cited in Tim O’Reilly’s seminal essay on What Is Web 2.0 (top of page two), where he gives the concept a lot of credit for creating some of the Web’s major successes:

“Overture and Google’s success came from an understanding of what Chris Anderson refers to as “the long tail,” the collective power of the small sites that make up the bulk of the web’s content.” - Tim O’Reilly







For those who haven’t been tracking it, The Long Tail essentially describes the mass servicing of micromarkets, which is primarily made possible, even cost effective, by the delivery system of the Web itself.  This is what the subtitle of the book puts another way as Why The Future of Business is Selling Less of More.  And it’s not some obscure buzzword, I’ve found The Long Tail to be an indispensable short hand in describing certain concepts and trends we see emerging in business and the Web these days.  For example, I’ve described Amazon’s innovative Mechanical Turk as a yet another one of their brilliant “long tail” plays.  So too how The Long Tail of enterprise software demand is finally being tapped using Web 2.0 technologies to cost effectively serve previously underserved portions of the enterprise which couldn’t previously justify the the expense, most notably in articles on ZDNet and here.

(more…)

“User” Generated Content and YouTube

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

YouTube has been getting a lot of press lately, both for its runaway success as well as for the real sources of its vast video library.  Rated as a top 20 destination on the Web, YouTube serves up at least a whopping 70 million videos a day to its users and also has over 60,000 new videos uploaded every 24 hours.  Founded by former Paypalers Steve Chen and Chad Hurley, YouTube is about as classic a Web 2.0 play as you could describe:  Not only does it harness the collective intelligence of the Web, a charming if slightly obtuse turn of phrase Tim O’Reilly uses to describe the core of the Web’s next generation, YouTube is also a relatively open platform for video sharing.  They make it possible for anyone to share YouTube’s videos just about anywhere else on the Web.

In fact, to see how well YouTube works, I signed up for an acocunt and had the video below, which I located on YouTube about last year’s Web 2.0 Conference (props to Alexander Muse for a pretty darn good production), cross hosted right here in this blog post.  It took all of 2 minutes from beginning to end, from signing up and to starting to share.  Like TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington recently wrote, YouTube makes video sharing really, really simple, and that’s a not-to-be-underestimated ingredient in their success.

Example of YouTube Hosted Video:

 

Excerpts from Last Year’s Web 2.0 Conference

(more…)

Handicapping The Next Big Web 2.0 Sites for 2006

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

It’s getting near the end of the summer of 2006 and it’s been a pretty amazing run-up this year for the world of Web 2.0 software.  MySpace and YouTube have made a tremendous mark on the industry as they showed the world what’s possible with user generated content, viral growth, and the two-way Web.  MySpace and YouTube are currently at or near the very top of the traffic charts at this moment, even though they’re only a couple of years old.  Richard MacManus further highlighted this trend a few days ago while referencing analysis that showed that the big Internet portals, such as Google and Yahoo!, were being closely followed by the top 10 social networking sites.

Yes, it’s clear that via social networking or otherwise, architectures of participation are the next big thing in online software because of their ability to flourish and become successful with enormous speed.  The big question, as I speculated recently, is whether MySpace and YouTube are just two quirks, or are they just the harbinger of a generation of new online social sites.  So, in the spirit of intellectual curiosity and unfettered inquiry, I did put together some research to see if we could discern some of the next big players in the Web 2.0 world.  Admittedly, this is a high-risk endeavor with a good chance of missing the target, but it highlights some interesting sites of nothing else, and a few of these clearly seem on a significant upswing.

The criteria to make this list was 1) the site has to be a two-way Web application that primarily harnesses the collective intelligence of its users in some way, 2) it has to be on a steady traffic rise and used by ‘ordinary’ people mostly outside of the Web 2.0 community and, 3) was not clearly a previously known big name portal or social network still perceived to be a major up-and-comer.  The result is what you see below and I hope you enjoy it.  Finally, note this list  — like all my popular Web 2.0 software lists — is entirely of my own creation and any errors or omissions are entirely mine.  And please, no need to post comments about the subjectivity of Alexa traffic charts; that’s a given.  A big thanks to Mark Scrimshire for helping me assemble some of this research.

(more…)

Creating Web 2.0 Applications: Seven Ways to Fully Embrace the Network

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

It’s interesting to watch the hype around Web 2.0 increasingly crystallize from a general perception of marketing mirage and investor snake oil to the many valuable concepts that are actually represented by the term.  One of the best examples of this is Jason Fried’s fascinating new survey of 500 random Basecamp users, asking them what they think Web 2.0 is.  A mere 13% had never heard of it and some of the answers are not only extremely good but the overall depth of knowledge is impressive.  Perhaps it’s just the quality of 37signals users, but I suspect 500 people represents a reasonably broad sample of online people.  In fact, the survey itself is pretty much Web 2.0 collective intelligence in action, if fairly unstructured.

Our next stop is TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington and his excellent new 24 minute Web 2.0 documentary that asks very astute questions about what really seems to be changing on the Web (and sure, Web 2.0 represents networked applications based on architectures of participation, but we’ve had those before; it’s the way we’ve all started to use the Web for forming personal relationships and sharing our content, right?)  In any case, Mike does a great job asking the leaders of Web 2.0 companies about business models, user generated content, and much more.

Web 2.0 Applications: Network Effects, Connections, and Links

And speaking of business models, Google itself is muscling in and both skimming off and monetizing the now-galactic presence of tens of millions of Web 2.0 users in MySpace, YouTube, and Digg.  This starts to point to some overarching strategies for making Web 2.0 business models successful that we’ll explore in a moment.

But, like it’s been just about from the beginning, it’s Tim O’Reilly that continually provides the raw blueprints for what happening with Web 2.0.  In one of his recent posts (”Levels of the Game: The Hierarchy of Web 2.0 Applications”), he not only clearly articulates the different levels of Web 2.0 software; he zeroes in again on what makes the enormous numbers of roving Web users out there “glom” onto these sites. All you have to do is “embrace the network, to understand what creates network effects, and then to harness them in everything you do.”

(more…)